Quote:
Originally Posted by seircram
Though, we seem to be ragging on the validity of "channels", rather than the validity of the message.
Where does one start?
|
Simple, over the last few years in particular the internet has become flooded with these so called channels and from my observation, they all have generic messages that these entities feel we need to know. Yet there is never any real substance, messages are vague and general. But to your question, where does one start.
The first major key or component in any channeled info is validity. Can you give or quote ANY source where channeled info was validated? (shown to be correct) I don't just mean prediction, ANY form of validity for any channeled message? Even Mediums must have validation for their messages to show they are getting their info from "somewhere else"
Without it, it is just the ramblings of delusion, I would however like to be proved wrong!