Hi Barron,
I think you may have unravellved my confusion.
It all of a sudden is beginning to make a little more sense to me now.
I'm going to spend some extra time to think about this, because this idea could explain many things to me that perhaps I had difficulty in beleiving before.
I need to look back on all the notes I have.
Best regards,
Steve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barron
Hi Steve
Thanks for your reply. Yes, am aware of Greer and his courses whereby you can go out into the wilderness at "hotspots" and summons the ETs. Apparently many of the course attendeees have seen and photographed/filmed ETs and ET craft. It is my understanding that some are quite physical but many are not, that is, less physical than what we term physical. Say, etheric, if you like.
And some of the ETs would be beyond most people's physical sight unless they have clairvoyant vision unless the ETs wanted themselves to be seen and then can do so. Some do indeed have very physical craft, and some have craft that are slightly physical, meaning still with a physicality but way less dense than we term 100% physical.
I, personally, see no problems at all with Greer and his non-physical ETs. Some of them can materialise and dematerialise at will. You will know this as many UFO sightings are here one second and then appear hundreds or thousands of miles away in a split second on radar - so it is clear that whilst they are capable of very quick speeds, in this case, they are merely disappearing from one place and reappearing at another. (like teleporation, if you will)
Personally, i have huge respect for Greer and believe he is definitely one of the much more enlightened and genuine researchers around in the UFO community. It does bug me though that it seems to take sooooo long to get that free energy technology out there though! The time is NOW for disclosure of this free energy technology!
If you have more questions re the physicality or otherwise of aliens or their craft please just ask me.
Cheers
|