Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Psychegram
It occurs to me in passing that the word might not be in existence within any human language. You mentioned the idea of kinesiology tests, to determine psycho-physical effects; these might however arise phonetically or syllabically rather than denotationally, kind of the way Ohm has an effect completely unrelated to any meaning (or a meaning that arises from the sound itself, rather than the sound being associated with an arbitrary meaning.) If this is the case the new word that would ultimately be discovered could perhaps be adopted as a name for the nebulous new world; such a name would have a power to it, provide a focal point for the energies of all those who perceive the better world we can all have.
|
A new word or even a non-lingual sound, one not previously connected to existing definitions, thoughtforms, implications or previous users would necessarily avoid being easily dismissed or tied to some common or tangential definition. Words like "love", "Christ" or even "I AM", regardless of how they're used now, all carry the residue of having been hijacked, sold and prostituted by vampiric energies. Personally, I try to avoid most of the archetypal words and symbols, as they've been around the planet for ages and have been used and abused in many ways that have left energetic baggage on their etheric fields.
It's almost the same as the problems associated with calling on spirits or ascended masters to work on our behalf. There are a host of spiritual beings already working on this project, but what their names are, I can't be sure.
A new word could mean what we want it to mean and would have an evolving definition...evolving both in it's complexity and also in clarity.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asteram
Symbolism and pictures are the language to communicate with. What symbols do we already have that indicate the concept? Do we have any symbols presently in our collective lexicon? It might be worthwhile perusing the symbols at the WingMakers web site for ideas. Crop circles would be another. And something completely new and original would be best of all.
|
I don't want get sidetracked into a tangent about Wingmakers, but I wouldn't be comfortable using any of their symbols. WM started out as information, but now it's another myth that's evolved into one more system... a much higher frequency system than most of what's out there, but a system nonetheless, and one that I see as part of the distraction that's outside of the focus of what you're proposing here. Crop circles seem less attached to any human paradigm, though I don't claim to understand where they come from or their actual meanings. I agree, "new" would be best.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asteram
Psychegram's vision of all life in the universe is very grand; do we want to be that inclusive at this point, or do we want to start with just humanity or with all life on Earth? We are coming from serious separation, distinct humans who do not trust each other. I'm getting a mental image of connection somehow, more like an interconnected web than roots. The internet? The world wide web? Might be an idea to follow up on.
|
Indeed, the separation is evident right here in this thread:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ara
Asteram, I have a feeling your idea is about to be implemented during the coming Worldwide Meditation Events Astralwalker is convening.
In regard to the upcoming Worldwide Meditation Events, specific sound frequencies are being woven together , by PhiedPiper, for the meditation participants to listen to.
Many Minds world wide are going to be on the 'same wave length' at the same time, all connected at once, forming a mental grid if you will.
|
Astralwalker's event was dismissed earlier, but I think the differences between what he's doing and the direction of this thread need to be addressed. I'm not sure where the "2012 Nexus event" vector is leading. I do know that I don't resonate with the 2012 fear program, the air-fairy approach, Buddhist meditations or much of what I saw as I skimmed through the thread (can't say I had time to read all 30+ pages), but there are definitely correlations to what's being discussed here that will be confusing to many people...and this fact has been brought up in Astralwalker's thread. Are we One with Astralwalker? If so, how so? If not, how can we be One?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asteram
I am One. Are you One too?
|
As far as a slogan goes, this works for me. It's much better than "We are One". I and the psychopathic alien interlopers may both be a part of creation, but I am
not one of them. They have no desire to turn the planet back over to the Gaian consciousness and I have no desire to be (further) diluted into their entropic state. But I am One with this project...I was a part of it long before
The Handbook ever appeared.
Besides, who are we to speak for others?
I can only speak for myself and I am One. Are you one too?
The unspoken "we" that's born from such a statement will define itself.
I M 1 R U 1 2 ?