Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykzJE...layer_embedded

This is a very interesting interview for those interested in bases on moons etc

Just checked enterprise mission, his latest work he refers to has yet to be published. When it is someone should post the link....

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

I love Richard hoaglands work i bought his book the secrets of nasa a really good read.
it has alot of great pictures of the moon and mars ruins

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

I like him because he is so fixated on things he can only prove with hard physical evidence, a mindset much like my own. However, this sometimes closes his mind off to what other ppl say in the field. For example, he believes any 'conspiricy' talk of Obama is nonsence.
He also has a dig at John Lear for his beliefs about the moon in this interview.
Oh yeah, and he still thinks the official Apollo 11 landed on the moon. I cannot agree with him there.

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

Still no sign of Hoaglands analysis on his site, I came across this while searching....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDNOc...layer_embedded

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

I can.
That's the beauty of the whole initial Apollo 11 plan.
An absolutely brilliant scheme, that's what it is!

Thinking outside the box is a skill that ought to be learned as young as possible.

Reading, writing, thinking, philosophy + drinking, how to whistle on your fingers, how to McGyver a complicated crop circle in the middle of a moonless night, with a stick, a rope, & a 'flattener', (There's a million - 1,000,000 - $$$ waiting for you, at a Rockefeller Foundation!) ...

If I had the energy I would initiate COOL SCHOOL's all over the world.

Conspiracies are easy to detect: if it smells like a rat, looks like a rat, has the size of a rat, & you're made to believe it is a mouse (or a unicorn, for that matter) something fishy's going on.
:fish:

You know what saddens me?
Hoagland used to be the kind of guests Camelot attracked.

A month or two ago I heared Kerry interviewing an Indiana Jones wanna be, who was begging - demanding donations for a mad treasure hunt in Central Africa. Why? I immidiatly forgot.

Hoagland is cool. He's not in it for the petty cash anymore - he is a wealthy man, & he keeps doing what he used to do; DIGGING FOR ANSWERS! :thumb_yello:

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

For some reason...I keep thinking of the Apollo missions as being hybrid missions...using conventional rocketry to achieve Earth orbit...and unconventional technology to achieve Lunar landings. Could some of the Lunar mission photography really be from the Secret Space Program? What if the Apollo astronauts only achieved Earth orbit...and just played with themselves...instead of landing on the Moon? What if the rest of each Lunar mission was carried out by the Secret Space Program...with heavily edited photography and studio footage for us goyim? :naughty:

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...os-viking1.jpg
Gazbom's blog on Phobos
I still don't think hoagland tells the whole truth, we are being drip-fed to another agenda, it wouldn't surprise me if he was a mason.
Good to see avalon is still alive :original:

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

He has said that Phobos isn't the only artificial satellite in our solar system. There are many.

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/~astrola...assini_big.jpg
Iapetus, moon of Saturn, looks like a walnut. The ridge is 20 miles high and goes right round the whole way.

Re: Richard Hoagland - Phobos is artificial
 

Iapetus also looks like the twinsister of the 'Death Star' from Star Wars.
Which makes you wonder where George Lucas gets his info from.

Apart from that, - correct me if I'm wrong - when that Star Wars episode was released, there were officialy no photo's made of Iapetus yet, by NASA.

Which suggests that there is indeed a Secret Space program.